ob[li]f(e)ious: it's about time

30 October 2012

"Live your life in a way that doesn't make a mockery of your values."

Today, back from the Midwest U.S. after 6 months, driven with a new yet familiar awakening of a fluid letting go-ness, a natural familiarity with the revolution driving me, I stop in a public library to take shelter from the rain. While waiting for a computer, I read in the current issue of Rolling Stone (Nov. 8, 2012) the story of the federal prosecution of a young DIY hacktivist described by a close friend as a "modern day Abbie Hoffman." It's the story of Jeremy Hammond, and the article is called "Enemy of the State: The Rise and Fall of an American Revolutionary." Feeling the necessity now more than ever, the sense of urgency, to make every moment real and new, to remove myself from any inhibiting traces of past ideologies, I'm inspired by a quote from Bill Ayers, the former Weather Underground leader who influenced Hammond possibly while teaching at the University of Illinois--Chicago since Hammond was a student there at the same time. The quote originally appears in Ayers' memoir, Fugitive Days.

LIVE YOUR LIFE IN A WAY THAT DOESN'T MAKE A MOCKERY OF YOUR VALUES.

As I continue looking through the artifice, I take note of the signs, the messages, pushing themselves through my thick head until they register. This one will continue to be relevant, and I will try to maintain a consciousness of it.

05 June 2012

The Future of Social Networking: A Vision [part 1]

what if each person's social online content was a book in its own right that had the full access and privileges to reach as many people as possible all over the world, that was able to ensure that it was reaching the people it intended to reach, to use the tools that are only reserved for corporate publishers, advertising and marketing agencies worldwide? would the system collapse, or would there be a system restore?

The Future of Social Networking: A Vision [part 2]

what if social networking wasn't just a term that referred to disconnected people finding each other through the internet? what if the infrastructure was in place to sustain a world that was based on sustainable relationships? what if people acted locally and thought globally, and welcomed people from anywhere on the planet into their local community as friends? or what if we bridged the gaps between those who have much and those who have little? how much longer can this possibly take? whether you have a nihilistic view that destruction of our species is inevitable, an idealistic view that the best for the world is inevitable, or a resolved view that both are inevitable and coexistent, one thing is common between us all: we want to know what we are. we want to go home. what are you doing to take us there?

LIFE

"Life," by Decio Pignari, conveys, perhaps, my favorite idea: compression and combustion (as creation), expressing concepts such as oneness and compression, while achieving simultaneously an image of evolution. Like the title of this zine, "Life" seems to operate intuitively as an asemic poem, being the thing itself that it wants to express. It conveys even more when, appropriately as a cinepoem, it is played as film reel in which the fundamental principles, the phonemes (the linguistic or fundamental one-syllable human sounds which are known as letters in written form) join together in a procession, to form one unit (word), and conveys many ideas in that central condensed byte of information. As theorists and authors such as C.G. Jung, James Joyce, and Joseph Campbell have indicated, definitely influenced by Biblical and other mythical imagery, a word, as a symbol, is the thing itself. Within its form is its concentrated essence, which it may at any time choose to leak out, thereby manifesting itself in the material world.

A Guiding Principle

Accurate information begins with a question, rather than a statement.

We can say this because a statement reinforces an existing belief and the only way beyond it is to look at it differently, from another perspective, which is why we question.

From the question comes a hypothesis as we gather information and appreciation for what we're studying. The goal is maximum appreciation, maximum analysis and maximum willingness to adjust our view in light of what is discovered in that awareness.

Further, through dialog--discussing and analyzing ideas in a nonconfrontational way, presented with trusted others--we work at seeing things from other perspectives that we could not have considered ourselves before due to the limits of subjectivity.

For instance, a paper topic may resemble the following.

paper topic:

violence in media: mass effect on society (all age groups): desensitization? intention? who's behind it?

First of all, if such a question is to be proposed as a topic to explore by the group in consideration for publication, I would suggest that the question must first be asked, "Is this a question worth exploring?" This is not to say we instantly should dismiss any proposed topic; to the contrary, appropriate consideration should be taken to determine factors such as whether the topic agrees with the intentions of the publication, and whether the available evidence on the subject could generate a thesis which would agree with the publication's theme and general purpose.

After these considerations have been made, the group would discuss the above sample topic. In this scenario, one must be careful with the question, "desensitization," since it is one that appears to be leading one to a conclusion, promoting bias. However, if one is willing to accept an alternate conclusion, and keep the process of discovery open-ended until adequate information is received that properly evaluates both or more possibilities, the question can be reasonably answered. Perhaps "desensitization" could be rethought and replaced with a word that would answer this question without promoting bias. Answering a question is the intention of this group; answering questions from a precept, bias, or any other motive than to discover the essential thing itself, will not yield the results we intend to grasp. I am, so far, encouraging the observance of a subject-object continuum, where all viewpoints are valid, though objective information may be separated from subjective experience and exposed as artificial and problematic.

The Ax Handle Story

". . .by living with them on a daily basis, I was continually struck by their profound practicality. They did not talk of doing things; they did them. One day I was walking in the forest with a man named Rafael. I mentioned that I needed a new handle for my ax. He stopped in his tracks, saying, 'ah yes,' and used his machete to cut a little hardwood tree a few steps off the path. Then he carved an impeccable handle that was to last longer than the ax itself. He spent about twenty minutes doing the bulk of the work right there in the forest and an additional twenty minutes at home doing the adjustments. Perfect work, carried out by eye alone. Up until then, I had always thought that ax handles came from hardware stores."-Jeremy Narby, The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the Origins of Knowledge